🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to scrub African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.